SAT
20,000
Growing depth
465 hard items · 537 rejected by quality gates
Question Bank Depth
The SAT/ACT product now reports bank size, hard-item coverage, section spread, thin skills, and explanation requirements. This is the operating layer that keeps Target Practice credible next to official practice, free practice tools, and paid prep banks.
SAT
Growing depth
465 hard items · 537 rejected by quality gates
ACT
Growing depth
340 hard items · 274 rejected by quality gates
Public SAT/ACT Skill Coverage Map
This is the inspection layer parents, tutors, and skeptical students need before trusting a paid week: how many original items exist, how many are hard, which skills are protected from thin first assignments, and where the next authoring sprint is aimed.
SAT buyer scorecard
Thin skills being watched
Concision · Text Structure · Sentence Boundaries
ACT buyer scorecard
Thin skills being watched
Evidence · Precision · Experiment Logic
Highest-conversion leak clusters now receiving hard-item expansion
SAT transitions and boundaries under Module 2 pacing
SAT advanced math setup, functions, and typed-answer format leaks
ACT Science/Data graph comparison and experimental design
ACT English transitions, concision, and punctuation under speed
Full-Length Coverage
Full simulations reduce the need to leave Target Practice just to feel exam stamina. Official tools still remain the benchmark source for official scoring and current test-day rules.
SAT Full-Length
98 original questions across two Reading/Writing modules and two Math modules. Use Bluebook for official benchmark scoring; use this when the student wants to stay in Target Practice for stamina and proof.
ACT Full-Length
215 original questions across English, Math, Reading, and Science/Data. Use official ACT materials for official benchmark scoring; use this when the student wants one long in-app run.
Competitive Gap to Close
This is the UWorld/Khan-style parity gap Target Practice should close before making strong bank-depth claims: hard SAT/ACT sets, AP course coverage, paid-ready teaching gates, and fuller simulator coverage.
SAT hard-item gap
465 / 800 hard items
335 remaining
ACT hard-item gap
340 / 800 hard items
460 remaining
AP World item gap
383 / 700 original items
317 remaining
AP Precalculus item gap
300 / 600 original items
300 remaining
AP Psychology item gap
200 / 500 original items
300 remaining
Next build target: close SAT/ACT hard-item gaps first, then lift paid-ready skill gates with choice rationales and deep-dive templates before claiming full bank parity.
10-Week Depth Sprint
The plan closes the gap in weekly releases: first SAT/ACT hard-item credibility, then teaching gates, AP course depth, timed environments, and finally release-claim QA.
Sprint 1 Acceptance Criteria
Publish the live parity dashboard with current gap math and first-week targets.
Create the first hard-item authoring queue for SAT Math, SAT Reading/Writing, ACT Math, and ACT Science/Data.
Require every Sprint 1 item to include correct rationale, distractor rationales, trap type, difficulty, and transfer prompt.
Do not count an item toward parity unless it passes source-safety and answer-choice quality checks.
Weekly Release Plan
Hard-item calibration foundation
Sprint 1 creates the operating system for closing the P0 SAT/ACT hard-item gap without inflating claims.
Math ceiling depth
High-score math practice starts to feel earned instead of generic.
SAT verbal hard depth
SAT verbal stops being the thinest first impression for advanced students.
ACT section depth
ACT can stand on its own instead of feeling like SAT with labels swapped.
Teaching-gate lift
The first paid assignment teaches more like a coach and less like an answer key.
AP World depth
AP World becomes a credible course-native bank, not just a sample pathway.
AP Precalculus depth
Precalculus practice matches the course shape instead of over-indexing on easy MCQ.
AP Psychology depth
AP Psychology has enough scenario variety to feel like a real exam prep path.
Timed environment parity
Practice feels closer to test day and produces better evidence.
Release QA and claim discipline
Full-release language matches the depth the product can actually defend.
SAT Coverage
Next bank priorities
Concision
Writing · 1 items · 1 hard · avg difficulty 4
Text Structure
Reading · 1 items · 0 hard · avg difficulty 3
Sentence Boundaries
Writing · 1 items · 0 hard · avg difficulty 2
Development
Writing · 1 items · 0 hard · avg difficulty 3
Trends
Science/Data · 1 items · 0 hard · avg difficulty 2
ACT Coverage
Next bank priorities
Evidence
Reading · 1 items · 1 hard · avg difficulty 4
Precision
English · 1 items · 1 hard · avg difficulty 4
Experiment Logic
Science/Data · 1 items · 0 hard · avg difficulty 3
Elite Score Challenge
Science · 2 items · 2 hard · avg difficulty 5
Elite Score Challenge
Reading · 4 items · 4 hard · avg difficulty 5
Explanation Quality Contract
Correct-answer proof
Wrong-answer trap for every choice
Fast method
Slow method
I still don't get it deep-dive module
Guided fill-in-the-blank transfer
Independent transfer rep
Teaching-quality status: deepDiveReady, workedOnly, genericFallback, or needsTemplate
Calculator or Desmos strategy when useful
Repeat-or-advance decision
Parent update line
SAT assignment quality check
Skills need enough validated items, hard reps, choice rationales, and deep-dive transfer before they lead the next assignment.
Skills to review before assigning first
Concision
Writing · 1 items · 1/3 deep-dive ready
thin question count · thin hard question count · thin deep dive ready count
Text Structure
Reading · 1 items · 0/3 deep-dive ready
thin question count · thin hard question count · thin deep dive ready count · low teaching quality score · thin choice rationale coverage
Sentence Boundaries
Writing · 1 items · 1/3 deep-dive ready
thin question count · thin hard question count · thin deep dive ready count · thin choice rationale coverage
Development
Writing · 1 items · 0/3 deep-dive ready
thin question count · thin hard question count · thin deep dive ready count · low teaching quality score · thin choice rationale coverage
Trends
Science/Data · 1 items · 1/3 deep-dive ready
thin question count · thin hard question count · thin deep dive ready count · thin choice rationale coverage
ACT assignment quality check
Skills need enough validated items, hard reps, choice rationales, and deep-dive transfer before they lead the next assignment.
Skills to review before assigning first
Evidence
Reading · 1 items · 1/3 deep-dive ready
thin question count · thin hard question count · thin deep dive ready count
Precision
English · 1 items · 1/3 deep-dive ready
thin question count · thin hard question count · thin deep dive ready count
Experiment Logic
Science/Data · 1 items · 1/3 deep-dive ready
thin question count · thin hard question count · thin deep dive ready count · thin choice rationale coverage
Elite Score Challenge
Science · 2 items · 0/3 deep-dive ready
thin question count · thin deep dive ready count · low teaching quality score · thin choice rationale coverage
Elite Score Challenge
Reading · 4 items · 0/3 deep-dive ready
thin question count · thin deep dive ready count · low teaching quality score · thin choice rationale coverage
SAT Teaching Quality
Teaching coverage sprint
Target: 80% deep-dive ready. Author 8,086 more high-frequency modules to hit 16,000 ready items.
Elite Score Challenge
Math · needsTemplate · missing deep dive template
Elite Score Challenge
Math · needsTemplate · missing deep dive template
Elite Score Challenge
Math · needsTemplate · missing deep dive template
Elite Score Challenge
Math · needsTemplate · missing deep dive template
Highest-priority coaching gaps
Elite Score Challenge
Math · needsTemplate · score 20/100
Concept help without leaving the loop
Elite Score Challenge
Math · needsTemplate · score 20/100
Concept help without leaving the loop
Elite Score Challenge
Math · needsTemplate · score 20/100
Concept help without leaving the loop
Elite Score Challenge
Math · needsTemplate · score 20/100
Concept help without leaving the loop
Elite Score Challenge
Reading/Writing · needsTemplate · score 20/100
Strategy help without leaving the loop
ACT Teaching Quality
Teaching coverage sprint
Target: 80% deep-dive ready. Author 2,708 more high-frequency modules to hit 16,000 ready items.
Elite Score Challenge
Math · needsTemplate · missing deep dive template
Elite Score Challenge
Science · needsTemplate · missing deep dive template
Elite Score Challenge
Reading · needsTemplate · missing deep dive template
Elite Score Challenge
Math · needsTemplate · missing deep dive template
Highest-priority coaching gaps
Elite Score Challenge
Math · needsTemplate · score 20/100
Concept help without leaving the loop
Elite Score Challenge
Science · needsTemplate · score 20/100
Skill help without leaving the loop
Elite Score Challenge
Reading · needsTemplate · score 20/100
Strategy help without leaving the loop
Elite Score Challenge
Math · needsTemplate · score 20/100
Concept help without leaving the loop
Elite Score Challenge
Math · needsTemplate · score 20/100
Concept help without leaving the loop
Practice Coverage Checks
Official practice
Import official Bluebook/Khan evidence, then turn it into original assignments and parent updates.
Digital-test practice
Run module-style drills with clock, bookmark, calculator prompt, trap labels, and score updates.
Question banks
Expose coverage by skill, launch custom drills, and require choice-by-choice explanations.
Study plans
Use diagnostic evidence, assignment outcomes, and weekly updates to show what changed before predicting upside.